No user would like to pay for the program that doesn’t provide them with good quality and advanced features, which is why you should check for various plans at different vendors. Price is another factor that shouldn’t be neglected. The objective was to see whether these actions can be seamlessly performed while antivirus was running in the background.īitdefender or Avast: Which One is More Cost-Effective? The test has been performed on a robust machine with 8GB of RAM, Intel Core i7 CPU and SSD disks, where users were copying files, archiving and unarchiving files, installing and uninstalling applications, launching programs, downloading files and browsing websites. The goal of the test is to evaluate the impact of antivirus on system performance, especially when programs are running in the background – for example, during real-time protection. To see how Avast and Bitdefender function in this field, we have prepared the results based on the testing performed by AV-Comparatives.
#AVAST OR BITDEFENDER SOFTWARE#
If your machine is a bit older and doesn’t have much RAM or processing power, you should go for lightweight or cloud-based software since they won’t require a lot of energy. Therefore, you’re advised to check the system requirements provided by any vendor and see whether your computer can handle it or not. System performance is another factor that will impact the user’s decision about purchasing a particular program.Īntivirus programs can be quite robust, which is why they may affect the system performance significantly. Besides, they have been awarded an ADVANECED+ certificate by AV-Comparatives this year.Īvast vs Bitdefender: What about System Performance? Both antivirus programs provide top-notch security functions, and they will protect you from even the most advanced threats.
To conclude this section, we can say that the score is tied. When an antivirus program keeps blocking even the files that contain no malware, it affects the user experience and overall efficiency. The good thing is that neither of them showed false-positive scores.
Still, it failed to protect the system in two cases. Besides, there was no alert.īitdefender, on the other hand, successfully detected malware before it was executed almost every time. However, if we take a closer look, we will see that Avast has established an unstable C2 session even in three cases, which could have opened the door to system exploit. We can see that Avast has scored better than Bitdefender here. The numbers 1-15 refer to different attacks that were used for testing, and the symbols show how the products responded to them.
#AVAST OR BITDEFENDER FULL#
There were fifteen different attacks (phishing and script attacks mostly) implemented in order to test various antivirus programs, including Bitdefender and Avast, as well as the C2 channel, used to give the attacker full access to the compromised system.
One of the tests was Enhanced Real-World Test 2019, and it was used to show the program’s ability to detect and respond to the most advanced threats, attacks and exploits. The results will show how both programs responded to malware and whether they removed it successfully.
#AVAST OR BITDEFENDER FREE#
When it comes to comparison between Avast Free Antivirus and Bitdefender Internet Security, we’re about to show you the results provided by AV-Comparatives. Despite its broad set of features that will attract the users, a particular antivirus can’t be considered if it can’t deliver enough security. The most crucial aspect of any antivirus is the level of protection it provides. Bitdefender vs Avast: Which One Provides Better Malware Protection?
0 kommentar(er)
